Tinplate6 Posted March 14, 2010 Share Posted March 14, 2010 Occasionally, I come across a gun that isn't obviously a ray gun, or other star defense weapon, however...it could be :huh: . In the 50's many toy manufacturers were cashing in on the space craze and hastily re-tooling their less popular guns to make them spacier and more appealing. This could be anything from slapping on rings and fins to a simple paint job and a rocket sticker. These machine guns fall into that category, they could be alien defense or simply beefed up gangster gats. Dunno...but I thought they had star potential (get it? Space...star...ok, never mind :rolleyes: ). Either way, here for your entertainment, I present these three toys. Dating from the 1950's, these 16 inchers were produced my Marx, however, I don't know their proper names. :blink: They are hand cranked, recoiling, rat-a-tat guns. The action is interesting to watch...the crank connects to a shaft with a drive gear, this gear has a pin on top that contacts a steel tongue mounted over a paper diaphragm, creating the clacking sound, like a new year's rattle. The same gear then drives a central shaft that has a reciprocating wheel on top. There is a metal rod offset mounted to it, like the drive wheel of a steam train, this is connected to the protruding barrel tip, that produces the recoiling effect. It's a simple but effective pre-electronic solution. I would love to know if these are truly ray guns, so, if you know the name of this toy please let me know, but either way, I think I'll keep them. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANZinSpace Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 I like this one. It definitely has a space feel to it - with the silver highlights and the horizontally mounted magazine, or is it magazines?. I also like the holes in the design which allows you to see the mechanism at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinplate6 Posted March 15, 2010 Author Share Posted March 15, 2010 Thanks ANZ, that's what I thought too, but I still don't know what it's called, I hope someone chimes in with an answer...Doc, are you receiving me? Come in Doc Atomic... :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Toyman Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 Hi Tinplate6, I agree with you there are quite a few "crossover" guns, and all it would take on this one would be a couple of stickers and hey presto, you're in outer space instead of prohibition Chicago :lol: I think it's a Marx G-Man gun? Here's a gun that I have as a "space" gun, just a shame the graphics aren't space related :( Noel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dratomic Posted March 15, 2010 Share Posted March 15, 2010 You know, I've seen these a few times, but have never come across a name or a box or anything like that. So honestly, I don't have any idea what they're called -- or whether they were intended to be space guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinplate6 Posted March 15, 2010 Author Share Posted March 15, 2010 Toyman, I have the same bubble gun, but I've never seen the box, and yes, it looks like a space gun to me...little bubbles of death I suppose. :blink: One pop, and you're history. :lol: I'll have to check that "G-man" lead, thanks.Doc, thanks for trying...anyone else care to make a guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinplate6 Posted March 15, 2010 Author Share Posted March 15, 2010 Ok, I did some research on the G-Man gun, and my guns are not them. I've posted a few shots of the G-Man gun and it is a much older toy from the 40's. I found two distinct types, one early all tin litho with wood stock, and and a later one half plastic . You'll note the similarity to the wind up Tom Corbett Space Cadet Gun, another example of toy recycling.Either way, we are going to need a better guess. :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.